Not a simple fate of Peter Parker on wide screens. There was an attempt to film Spider-Man back in 1977, but, as you know, the attempt was not entirely successful. Then, after almost thirty years, in 2002, Sam Reimi presents us with his creation about the life of Peter Parker-Spider-Man. As a result, a trilogy came out, where the third became a dubious part, but we will talk about its flaws.
Toby Maguire appeared before us in the title role, but not one trilogy is red: James Franco, Willem Defoe, Kirsten Dance, Alfred Molina and many other, already recognizable actors. Yes, yes, the best (so far the only) screen version of John Jameson was in this trilogy.
Further, we appeared in the Webb dilogy, which also metered on the title of trilogy, but did not grow together. This time, the approach to the film adaptation changed its direction, which I will reveal below, and it was the appearance of this dilogy that originated a war in the camp of fans of the stenolasis. Here you and Andrew Garfield, Emma Stone and a couple more recognizable actors. The most famous dispute "Maguire or Garfield" still torments the minds of hundreds.
After the film Captain America-Civil War, another spider man appeared, but before the solo film "The Kutus", I will not take it into account. Yes, the direction of the narrative has changed again towards the comic version, but this is already a separate conversation. So, let’s look more details at the Raimi trilogy and Webba Dilogy
Spider-Man Sam Reimi.
Let’s be honest with ourselves-this is the first film about Spider-Man, which fell on the period of our childhood. We saw him for the first time and, despite the rather strange moments, we loved him with all our hearts. Already revising the entire trilogy at a conscious age, you begin to notice these ridiculous, sometimes strange scenes that looked in childhood with a bang in childhood, and now they cause only a smile or surprise.
These were the times when Camoo Lee was just a https://ltccasino.co.uk/ pleasant addition to the film, and not the topic of discussion.
Of the pluses of the trilogy, I personally highlight the following:
– Good cast actors. As said above – James Franco (Harry Ozborn), Willem Defoe (Green Goblin), Kirsten Dans (Mary Jane), Alfred Molina (Dr. Octavius), as well as Toby Manuare (Peter Parker);
-great attention to the personal experiences of Peter Parker, which is largely plus the trilogy, because in comics, they also pay not a little attention to this issue, only with an eye on the fact that Spider-Man should be an equal amount. However, depending on Reimi’s films, the spider was not as fervent and dexterous as in comics. Yes, he is strong and fast, but looking at the comic-version of the character or animated you understand that still Toby is a chic pacorer, but not the best spider;
-Just the best John Jameson performed by Jay Kay Simmons, who gave us the famous newspaper as if he had left Amazing Spider-Man’s pages;
– One of the best images of Otto Octavius performed by a chic Alfred Molina. Honestly, I love the second film more than the first and third precisely because of his acting game. You empathize not only the hero, but also the villain, who, to some extent, is more antihero than the absolute evil in the form of the same goblin;
– Great soundtrack.
The disadvantages are concentrated to a greater extent in the third film, but here they are:
– Sometimes there is too much Peter Parker. It’s like a plus, but a huge minus. You came to watch the movie how the spider stuffs the face of the villain, and here for almost an hour of screen time, Peter is sad for and without it;
– The third film, who tried to introduce three villains at once, but slightly revealed only one, the other two passed by;
– sad, frail vein;
-Emo-Peter and his image of a fierce badly, which is comic of a chance;
– Living Gwen Staisi (the canon needs to be known);
-The strange relations of Peter and Em Jay, who seem to develop well at first, but here everything changes and seems to understand why, but the general dullness of their spasmodic advancements in a love of love involuntarily resembles not the best letters of comics about Spider-Man, where the same love nonsense was happening;
-In some places, ridiculous scenes, which seems to be nothing, but it would be better if they were not (emo-Peter, hello).
Bottom line: Reimi’s trilogy was more the first coming of Spider-Man on wide screens, so many fans of a friendly neighbor love her so much. Yes, we have a classic Parker, who drifts from the problem to the problem, but sometimes I want to get a more perky spider-man who cleverly and tastefully understands the bad guys. Alas, the spider in the Reimi trilogy is not so interesting.
"Spider-Man" Mark Webb.
While the Reimi trilogy tried to show the negative attitude of the authorities towards Visjilant in the mask, Webb made this one of the key moments of the first film of the dilogy.
Amazing Spider-Man or in the Russian box office “New Spider-Man” already at the start of filming caused double feelings of fans. Someone was waiting for the fourth film by Reimi, who remained only on sketches, and then in front of them is another director, actor and other retelling of the history of Spider-Man. Other actors, other scenery and the same hero. Is it cool? Now we will analyze.
From the positive aspects of the dilogy about Spider-Man, taken by Mark Webb, I will highlight the following:
-More Spider-Man! Yes, this seems to be attributed to the slogan of the dilogy. The gorgeously set combat scenes, the grace of the hero in place, and some combat scenes can be reviewed over and over again, amazed at the details;
– Gwen Staci or the story of the first love of Peter Parker. Emma Stone looks gorgeous in the role of Gwen that one cannot fail to deny. She is the same companion of Peter, who simply pleases the eye and does not all the time play the role of the victim, as Reimi with Mary Jane;
-finally paid attention to Parker’s parents. I don’t know how you, but there was not enough mysticism around the couple of parkers who died in a plane crash, which was in the comics and animated series;
– Changing the costume of the protagonist – from a bushy created suit to a cool image, known to us since childhood. I don’t know how you, but I liked the director’s approach to the image of the hero;
– Police against the spider! The moment when Spider-Man is shot by police and arrest was really tense, and similar situations were in comics. In the same Ultimate Spider-Man, for example, in the release of the 15th, the hero was shot in the shoulder and almost arrested;
– The road is the villain! I don’t know how you are, but an attempt to take other villains than in the Raimi trilogy is quite boasted. Kurt Connors pleased in the first film, even if the lizard does not look like a crocodile, and the electrical, rhino and a slightly different goblin also pleased the eye, albeit not without individual “but”. Although the laughter of the goblin simply pleased to trembling;
– a huge hint of an ominous six at the end of the second film;
-VEB shutters instead of an organic web. This is what the hell is cool! This is how they did it;
– "Exodus" Gwen is canonical, even if it is beaten a little different.
The minus of the dilogy can include the following points:
– An extremely strange approach to villains in the second film of the Dilogy. They almost did not open the electric, even if they tried, and the rhino was ten minutes. Yes, the local goblin differs from the original, but the sharp change in Harry Ozborn was somewhat embarrassed. Why am I leading it? More time to villains, damn it! The second film would be gorgeous if attention was focused not only on the spider and Gwen, but on this trinity;
– a rather dubious development of relations between Peter and Gwen in the second film. It’s not that I am delighted with Peter and Em Jay in the Reimi trilogy, but there are a couple of questions here to a couple of Webb. Like yes, I liked them in the first film, but in the second the screenwriter broke the teenage love of the heroes he created, which gradually grew into something more;
– Not the best Peter Parker. No, I liked him, but if you compare with the prototype from the comics, then you understand that this parker has almost no problems. A little on the love front is naught something, it seems there are problems with money, but in general everything is normal. Paradox, ladies and gentlemen, then what is not enough in the Raimi films in Webb;
– Not the most memorable soundtrack. Without jokes, remembering the Raimi trilogy, I can without mistakes to find out the title theme of his films about the spider, but I can’t do the same with the Webb dilogy.
Great power – great responsibility.
Comparing the trilogy with dilius, I began to notice that in fact these two spider perfectly complement each other. What is not in one – is in the other, and strictly on the contrary. We have really a canonical Peter Parker in the Reimi trilogy, who barely copes with his personal life, trying to find a balance between the superhero inside himself and study/work/relationships/relationships. But at the same time, we have an amazing man-spider Webba, who is dexterous and fast, funny and interesting. It is pleasant to observe his movements, and each battle is an attraction with cuffs and destruction.
So I finally understood why the disputes around these two spiders are still burning. In fact, both of them are good, but each in his own way. But both stepped on the same rake – a lot of villains on the screen is not the best solution. My personal view of the problem is simple – to introduce many villains, you need quite a few films where the spider will meet with them personally, literally face to face. This will help to make a whole picture where one hero and several villains will participate at the same time.
Of course, we have already experienced two incarnations of Spider-Man, so we will wait for the third coming and I hope it will not make the same mistakes that previous paintings. And that’s all the guys. Take care of yourself, read comics and watch a good movie.
Lascia un commento